Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
kslaughter
on 04/02/2014, 02:34:14 UTC
Seriously? If true does that mean that users that dont have 2fA activated can get their accounts wiped out from shares and bitcoins? Or was this a joke?

Actually I think this has happened previously.
'

Who doesn't use 2FA? That is just nonsense though. Like if you have the money to invest in half of these companies. Go buy a cheap used Android/iPhone and use it for 2FA. You don't even need a contract, just wifi. No reception and it still works.

Right. I use 2FA. But i know there are plenty of users that dont. Especially noobs. And being able to log into an account someone other owns is a serious threat. I wonder how that happened.




Just want to recover Active Mining BTC, while we can.  These are a bargain and should go very quick.


That implies little confidence that each share will receive .0005+ in dividends in a reasonable time frame. Otherwise THAT would be the best way to "recover Active Mining BTC".

You are not taking into account that Ukyo may do something legally to keep us from recovering our BTC.  So, that is why we are having a fire sale on these shares.

I have to second the question... how will it help you if he sues and the shares are gone? At the end this little game might cost VMC even more than the 100BTC are worth. I dont see your logic behind but it looks a bit like being in the right and winning. More personal than that the 100 btc matters. Which would be a poor reason.

If we have the shares and he sues, the court could keep us from selling the shares.  This way if he sues I have the 100 BTC to pay our legal fees.  If he sues, we would definitely counter sue for our 100 BTC that he owes us.  Since our chances to prevail on our counter suite would be very high, I think the chances of him suing us is very low.  Also, It takes cash to sue someone, and I don't think he has any, so he says.