this and that have nothing to do with each other. Implying I had a certain balance and then reversing said balance when in regardless of it all with or without their bug money I would've had said balance for plinko bet is really completely different from what you're stating. I would've had the money to make the bet regardless isn't that what it all comes down to. I assumed I won money you can't assume I didn't have the money to play if I didn't have the bug money cuhz I readily made the deposits. You're gonna side with the casino for what to save your sig money? Really don't be a jackass. In my shoes you wouldn't argue anything your saying so don't assume the casinos position when you know you'd probably be arguing just the same as I am to receive payment. They can't negate all factors of what happened till this point and argue because of the bug they can't pay me. I've deposited and kept depositing so who's to argue I wouldn't get there that day. They created the what if possibility simply because they delayed the bug bounty. And keep this in mind even if they only gave 0.08 with the deposits I made after that would still have been enough for the jackpot. I'm gonna argue why they were so late with bug payment when seemingly to me they gave everyone's payment earlier. Also they'd have to pay anyone who clicked auto play even once the bug bounty because even if the bug was used under the BPS auto pay option it would still be considered being a bug. Anyone who won from the auto play but lost money overall should get the bug bounty. You wanna argue trite information like that to defend the company tell me I'm wrong in saying they should pay all users 0.08 BTC. Anybody in correlation shouldve gotten paid. If they didn't though and they start doing that now because of what everyone on this forum has said, that begs in question why they can't allow the deposits I made after to correlate the plinko bets. After all that's considered their fault too is it not? Are they now suddenly inclined to only correct faults of their choosing? They can't defend their position on bugs without accepting my position because that contradicts that they can't reverse anything that's been done. There's even conversation suggesting hes willing to reverse someone's winning they had paid out in adrenaline. Regardless of whether the bug had anything to do with it isn't the problem. If the company is so willing to reverse the decision of all problems that arose from the game Adrenaline then they would have to include all the possibilities that could've happened without the game in play.

They're trying to make it sound like it couldn't have happened without the bugged money but yes it damn well would have bugged money or not this isn't a theory it's a fact.