When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda
]
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda
]respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.
You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.
You're never going to stop, are you ?
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.
No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.
Whilst you are about it can you present anything else you find that I am wrong about? go on ... get on with it. Demonstrate all those things I have been wrong about because as yet NOBODY has demonstrated that I am wrong about anything.
Until I see a complete removal of red trust abuse on my account then NO i will not stop presenting facts that is should not be there.
Well done.