a lot all of your feedbacks
Also the risked amounts don't seem to be credible.
Of course 50 risked BTC amount is not real but if you look at the 2013's post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664 :
"If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating."
I followed the rules and put 50 risked BTC to give a stronger rating. Other risked BTC amounts are 100% real!
This is a perfect example of the arbitrary enforcement of rules around here. If there is not a clearly defined set of rules, then even people who want to cooperate have no idea what they can and can't be doing. If there is no rule of "law" so to speak, then those in charge systematically debase their own authority. For some people apparently chaos is opportunity though...