FIRST!
Lauda is proven scammer, you are Lauda's pet
so if you pet of scammer you also scammer
you not agree?
do you wanna SECOND?
Interesting syllogism.Lauda is proven scammer, you are Lauda's pet
so if you pet of scammer you also scammer
you not agree?
do you wanna SECOND?
P1) Lauda is a proven scammer
P2) I am Lauda's pet
P3) A pet of a proven scammer is also a scammer.
C) I am a scammer.
None of your premises can be considered sound without definitive evidence however I will make it easy for you.
Suppose that P1 is true. Prove that P2 and P3 are true, thus creating sound conclusion that follows from sound premises.