Your premises of the slave or Lauda's pet label are still invalid and have not yet rejected the null hypothesis.
its your opinion and its false
That would imply that your premises are true by definition. That is, we have an axiom which implies "actmyname is a slave" or that "actmyname is Lauda's pet".
I don't think this is the case but we can change the evidence you must provide to this. Provide evidence that this axiom exists in our language.