Since the increase in DT-members, I've already noticed an increase in red tags. I can imagine a new user easily feels threatened, and I can also imagine many users don't mean bad. I'm not talking about the obvious and less obvious scammers that deserve red trust (and continue scamming with the next account), I'm talking about the "gray" cases in between.
I'd hate to see the supply of real new users dry up because of this. When someone isn't a clear scammer, don't they deserve the benefit of the doubt?
I'd like to add to this topic:
before leaving feedback, ask yourself if your feedback makes the forum better, and (if applicable) is it worth destroying someone's reputation?What I consider not taggable:
Posting an unpopular opinion.
I wanted to post an example, but it got too long so I made another topic. It seems to me this user got 3 red tags for his "unpopular opinion":
Red trust on Bestmixer: is this justified?.
At the other end of the scale, another mixer (who I didn't trust
from the start) had to
scam 16 Bitcoin first because DT (including myself) doesn't tag it without evidence.
Summary: if we keep going at this rate, I think we're damaging the forum and it's users!