@cryptohunter
I really like your signature.
I will talk to my webdesigner if its possible to create signatures which will display bbcodes which will be taken from a DB.
If yes i will create one with red colour and ask everyone who has been abused by that group to add that signature to create more attention to these abusers.
The response would be surely big.
Thanks that would be great. I am thinking of starting a union on this board. However now that theymos went against my advice of totally separating DT and Merit sources he has firmly placed DT in the hands of merit cyclers it would seem impossible for the systems to self regulate at all. All i see happening now is merit cyclers club (mostly the only ones to meet the merit threshold for the 2 key positions) will just recruit those they can be sure of support from.
A union will actually be quite effective against this group though because if we stick to posting facts and observable events demonstrating wrong doing and untrustworthy actions eventually we will eventually keep up enough pressure to force them to either abandon the board or remove any trust abuse they have conducted. This is the fairest way and the only way left open to us. If we lose our main accounts then it will be essential for friends to be asked to join whom have similar views to ourselves. Ie that every person should be treated fairly and judged on the real merit of their contributions here.
Of course we can not represent people that are proven untrustworthy but for real victims of their DT abuse we can provide support and also force these factual and observable abuses over and over until they are forced to debate the red trust and prove it is sensible and reasonable or remove it.
I know a few people who have contacted me have said they can not dare post under their real accounts because they fear that they will be destroyed. i fully understand this and do not blame you at all. Just beware you will all be accused of being me with no evidence provided at all and likely be red trusted on the mere suspicion.
I may also start a full DT listing with each member having a full facts based review of actions/non actions to factual observable events presented to them that they refuse to review or respond with a sensible response to.
This to me makes them untrustworthy also. I mean if you went to the police with factual evidence of someone breaking into your home or committing a crime and they flat out refused to view the evidence you can assume they are corrupt and complicit in the crime.