You just proofed you have no evidence and just made a negativ feedback based on your poor assumption.
You defamed me without having any proof.
Thats the best example how you defame legit members on that forum and defend your buddies demanding hard proof.
It's good enough proof for me. I'm not asking anyone else to post negative feedback for you.
On the other hand, if someone expects me to take action - yes, I would demand proof that is satisfactory to me.
Why are you typing so cryptically?
That's cryptohunter's alt in case you didn't know.
False statement. I have no alts here.
Again this is what you get from these system abusers.
I provide facts based proof and these bozos present some nonsense they make up with no support evidence AT ALL
Suchmoron has no clue how to debate, no clue on how to substantiate any of his bogus claims at all. He feels there is no need.
I can prove he is supporting a proven liar.
Can he prove I have any alts ?? no he can not.
He is untrustworthy the facts speak for themselves.
They will sink to any underhanded tactics to discredit those that oppose their collusion and untrustworthy behaviour. Therefore they are untrustworthy.
The same goes for DT who refuse to review and report back on facts and observable events that demonstrate untrustworthy behaviour from DT members and or merit sources.