"None of these members were dismissed as scammers."
If anyone without a reputation was dismissed as a scammer (your claim), it would be very hard for them to end up on DT1. They would have been tagged and would have little chance of achieving that. Out of those members I listed, do you think any of them are scammers? I'd like you to answer that question if you wouldn't mind.
What you see is subjective. If they are such scammers you shouldn't have much trouble documenting evidence of a crime, violation of a contractual agreement, or violation of a law. Anything else just allows for arbitrary power tripping which you and others have just demonstrated you are quite fond of.
If you don't see all the scamming that's going on here on the forum, you need glasses. And you've been here long enough to know that there's no contracts when someone pulls off a loan scam, PayPal chargebacks, offers 100% ROI within a week, or any of the other typical BCT scams, nor does anyone mention law. Why would we? Nobody is going to the police for any of the typical scammers that DT members tag.
As far as evidence goes, what do you call the information that gets presented in the scam accusation forms that members fill out when they get scammed? How about the alt accounts abusing bounties? The evidence is all there.
The forum polices itself against scams, and DT goes out of its way to help with that. The DT list is certainly not perfect, but it's nowhere near the cabal of power-hungry little Hitlers that you make it out to be.