When you include or exclude someone, stand by it. If the MAJORITY of the network calls you out on it, then maybe you should reconsider. Actually, even if you don't, everyone else is going to exclude him, proving my next point ->
Yes, you should wait for 30 people to contact you before correcting something that is objectively wrong and trivially corrected. 
-snip-
If this line somehow changes from "Each", to "5 people and their proxies" (because if you modify your list according to these 5 people, then you're a proxy to their own judgement), then the whole system falls back to what it was before.
A few people really need to re-assess how much influence they think they have, and a lot of other people need to start losing the inferiority complex if they're an active node of the trust list.
You really need to re-asses your "I can't be wrong" and "5 people can't agree with an opinion that is right, they must be proxies" bullshit.If this line somehow changes from "Each", to "5 people and their proxies" (because if you modify your list according to these 5 people, then you're a proxy to their own judgement), then the whole system falls back to what it was before.
A few people really need to re-assess how much influence they think they have, and a lot of other people need to start losing the inferiority complex if they're an active node of the trust list.
Do you even read what you write?
You're accusing me of the exact thing you do.Look, like you said, you're free to say whatever you want. Just as I am.
I'm trying to explain to people how wrong it is for them to listen to every opinion you (and others) write here. You also need to know that you could always be one iteration away from being off the list, in case they all agree that you're more of a nuisance rather than a helpful trust node.
I honestly can't see how you think what you're doing is okay. Just imagine you're a single node of 20 bitcoin nodes and one of them chooses to include or orphan a block, it doesn't matter right? Because the majority won't.
But now look at you forcing 3 more nodes to exclude it, and 2 other nodes doing the same, the whole network basically consists of 2 opinions then. That's exactly how this whole ordeal looks to me. Is it really hard to mind your own business and fix your own list? There's a HUGE difference between "I excluded x user because I think xxxx", and "You can't include x user in your list. Change it."
Not to even mention the pointless spam and post count that "include this and exclude that" creates.