What I was and still am advocating for is a protocol for negative ratings that requires a standard of evidence of theft, violation of contractual agreement, or violation of applicable laws. I have in detail described why this is needed
here, and in other posts.
That sounds very reasonable if I quote it like this, separately from the rest of your "personal attacks", which you amazingly engage in AND accuse others of engaging in, all within the same post. So unfortunately I have to keep excluding you because of your inconsistency but I would definitely be watching how you would apply all this in practice should you get into DT next week.