IMO it is not a "pointing fingers and threat in PM thing" or I can assure you I would have been the first one to know as by the nature of my business over this forum I'm mostly in contact with all the "gangs" you are talking about. In this thread I have seen, instead, attempts to address trust ratings of people that didnt even know they got in DT after the new rules and experienced DT members tried to give suggestions over some disputable feedbacks that have been left in the past and now became obsolete/uncalled/dangerous (hence some members have been ~tilded by some DT1 and advised in PM of the inconsistency of some of their past ratings.

Example:
this user  has been tagged by Lesbian Cow without reference
The same user posted here and then prolly to avoid the red paint, he posted here

I'm assuming Lesbian Cow being or being not in DT would make no difference: they should have posted a reference for that "Skamaroo" tag, now we dont know why that's a Skamaroo or we would be immediately able to tag even the second account that Skamaroo created. This is just an example in this case the Skamaroo just attempted to void the neg rep and he shouldn't have done that: new red paint coming.
But in case of more serious scam accusations or frauds, it is very important to provide DT members and the entire community a solid reference (or most of DT wont even bother to tag)

Some experienced DT tho have PMd cases like this kindly asking them to revise their feedback and ~tilded them until solved

Where is the #gang in yoru opinion?