Case #1 4 Accounts Connected:cryptoxchg,
cryptoxchgg,
sugarwomen, and very likely
bitcointradesg,
Case #2 2 Accounts Connected:chris2btc,
Btc2Boy,
Proof:It starts with
this thread started by bitcointradesg on the 24 January 2018, 06:57:38 (and last edited 23rd Dec 2018)
Let's look at the sequence of events:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Name: bitcointradesg u=1729419 Posts: 48 Date Registered: 22 January 2018, 19:37:16 | a
Name: cryptoxchg Posts: 1 Date Registered: 23 January 2018, 03:49:54 Last Active: 23 January 2018, 03:57:42 | a
Name: cryptoxchgg Posts: 2 Date Registered: 25 January 2018, 03:41:28 Last Active: 25 January 2018, 14:37:06 | a
Name: sugarwomen Posts: 4 Date Registered: 25 January 2018, 20:02:40 Last Active: 27 May 2018, 12:59:30 |
Day (0) bitcointradesg registers,
Day (+1) cryptoxchg registers
Day (+2) bitcointradesg creates their
Singapore BTC thread (
archive )
Day (+3a) cryptoxchgg registers and four minutes later starts a thread selling
BTC in Singapore Day (+3b) sugarwomen registers.
24 hours after bitcointradesg starts their thread
skorms posts this (
two and a half hours after cryptoxchgg starts their thread on
day +3):
bitcointradesg naturally denys the allegation:
Hi, I am not affiliated with that person.
Obviously that person has no sense on what the repercussions are with copy and pasting someone else's post, and creating a username almost similar to that person, posting it on the same forum and outright. What effect that has on the trust strangers would have to place in another online anonymous user met through a forum. This trust issue is of utmost importance especially when dealing with 5-6 digits. You should be in fact worried to trade with someone who places little emphasis on EQ or trust.
I'm officially stating that I'm not associated with that person.
In terms of proof, feel free to look at my posting history to see that I have been active ever since I created my account. We are also on different telegram accounts, apparently.
I am currently finalizing a trade and will request for the person to post a review after we have completed transaction. I will also provide some proof of the completed transaction after
So, let's start by looking at
cryptoxchgg's two posts:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzhello guys. i have a fair bit of bitcoin/ether to sell in Singapore. you can email me at: buyethereum21@gmail.comthanks:)
| I can supply ~100k sgd worth of bitcoins or ethereum at live market rate daily. This supply would increase next month. Prefer otc meet up if we're in the same country. Otherwise we can use online impartial escrow services, like localbitcoins, as I'm new to the forum and we don't personally know each other, so yeah we should protect each other. I'm selling at market floating rate +6%, at which timing or market rice to your convenience. Looking for frequent buyer! Kindly add me on telegram @chuckles00 to discuss further!
|
cryptoxchg posts just once (prior to
bitcointradesg starting their thread mind you) in a thread called "Singapore"
ArchiveCrucially,
cryptoxchg posts at
January 22, 2018, 05:52:40 PM GMT and it is not until bitcointradesg's first post at
January 23, 2018, 07:09:09 AM GMT that we learn
bitcointradesg is in Singapore.
Straight away we know that
cryptoxchg and
cryptoxchgg are alts.
bitcointradesg has two telegram accounts
telegram @Shabbs18 archive 2 3 4 5 6 and
telegram @Shabbs Archive buying/selling btc
Hi, I am able to supply around ~100k USD worth of BTC daily. I am a direct seller. I see your payment options and the best one I have access to is china bank. Can I you add me on
telegram @Shabbs to discuss further? Cheers!
Conclusion: cryptoxchgg was not created to be a copy cat as the original "single G" UID was created *before* the thread began. I feel
cryptoxchg was created to start threads in other sections of the forum as for some reason
cryptoxchg - the "single G" UID couldn't be accessed (locked out??). After exposure
sugarwomen was then created to bump the thread having just four unremarkable posts in a six day period then likely gave up on the account other than to look back in in May 2018.
Case #2 2 Accounts Connected:chris2btc,
Btc2Boy,
In the locked thread
Limburger wil BTC verkopen: Waar? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2028957.0 (
Archive ) the second to last post by
Btc2Boy uses the same Telegram contact details
Re: Limburger wil BTC verkopen: Waar?
November 10, 2017, 09:28:21 AM
#26
If you are offering big volumn, whatsapp me +8613068178967. I can pay in CASH.
Telegram@chris2btc
regards.
that chris2btc uses to necro-bump
cryptoxchgg post:
if you can be in Bangkok, then I can help. telegram @Chris2btc if you are interested in.
Cheers!
The earliest example of using both Telegram and whatsapp details in the one post can be seen here:
hello! Which countries are you located? I'm about to pay euro cash for it. So whatsapp+8613768178967 or telegram @Chris2btc for more info.
Cheers!
Most of chris2btc's 40 posts
here archive and
here archive contain both the telegram and whatsapp contact details while
Btc2Boy uses them just once in their
four posts archive between the 8th and 14th of November 2017 (and also has the whatsapp details on their
profile page archiveRelated Addresses:Case 1:buyethereum21@gmail.com
telegram @chuckles00
telegram @Shabbs18
telegram @Shabbs
Case 2:whatsapp +8613768178967
telegram @Chris2btc
Miscellaneous: Second case was only found due to their necro-bumping first cases' thread.