this proves he was shitposting.
Relevance?
Also, the person who got negative trust was early blackmailer:
EOAKLAND - blackmailerthis proves he was an early blackmailer
You probably haven't read the thread. And again - relevance? Og neg-trusted this user on accusation of being a purchased account, but after that was disproved he came up with a bunch of slimy excuses to not remove the rating. Nothing to do with shitposting or blackmail. Maybe he needs to revise the feedback again.
All these things make him worthy of tag and also for spamming a scam accusation with fake replies.
You still don't seem to grasp the difference between forum rules and the trust system.
No solid prooves that OgNasty was involved in this as anyone could hamper a persons identity on the telegram ( you could relate much of the ICO scams there). So, there is no conclusion to this case as the person on telegram could just be a troller. And at the same time, Ognasty personally tried to file a police complaint against the scammer.
You probably haven't read the thread. Fun fact:
Og neg-trusted another user for making the same assumption that you just made (that he contacted the police). Let's see if he neg-trusts you as well.
I read most of the chat in the screenshots here, it doesn't seem OgNasty is wrong in any way as he is just trying to let a campaign manager know that do not accept a troll in the campaign and on the other hand OG get a reply that he is "buying trusts" very ridiculous opinion.
Og is threatening to contact the person's employer unless he gets his way. I happen to think that's quite shitty.
None of this proves to show that OGnasty has a bad "personality" in his real life and you accused him of wrong being.
Good for you. I see it differently.