Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: DefaultTrust changes
by
cryptohunter
on 31/01/2019, 11:53:13 UTC
large number of users protesting

20 out of 2Mil.. yea a real large number buddy

LOL at this fool. When you want to talk about merit being cycled (which it clearly is) amongst the worse merit cycling offenders then those cyclers complain 2 million is a silly number and even 150k is a  HIGH number of users to consider in this comparison.

Now it suits them 2 million is the number we should work with.

There is a high number of people protesting out of the handful that visit meta or give a shit about the entire thing.

Actually I see nothing other than legitimate gripes backed by FACTS and hard EVIDENCE that the abuse of merit and DT is out of control and getting worse.

The entire board is going to turn into one huge war zone which is totally fine by me. I would rather entire anarchy than a controlled system that is corrupt and dominated by proven liars, trust abusers and worse.

I am just waiting for you tman lauda and owlcatz to pull of a real big extortion scheme or something worse so we can then ask theymos again about how such proven scum bags should be in positions of trust and see if sub optimal seems like a sensible term to use. Then all their supporting buddies can explain that too right before they are blacklisted from positions of trust.

When you see proven liars, who are implicated in all kinds of shady shit giving red trust to persons that have not done anything shady at all just because they would not endure their constant false accusations -- you know the entire system is broken and needs scrapping.