Well... If setting up two headless bitcoin-miners under linux with setups to later run four double gpu cards (atm running two cards in one box) be able to point these around through all this ixcoin, i0coin, solidcoin, i0coin again-crap and being really interested in namecoin because of its features who I think might be able to decentralize and free up the internet even more, if that counts as knowing more about bitcoins and alternate cryptocurrencies then the average newbie, then I suppose you maybe could whitelist me? Otherwise I'll have to post some more around here I suppose.
Edit: Just to add something in my frustration not to be able to reply, I would like to reply to this guy in some fancy easy-to-understand-way that when you are crunching numbers you're just crunching numbers, and these numbers could be the right hash for both the NMC block which contains one type of information and BTC-blocks which contains another type of information, thus being able to check if the hashes you crunch passes as either the BTC-hash or either the NMC-hash you could simply mine them both without loss, atleast minimize it to a low very level .
Thanks for trying to explain, but I still don't get it. Sorry... What am I missing please?
A block submitted for solve on the bitcoin network has the hash of the previous block, as well as BTC transactions, and the BTC address of the winning miner, as well as a nonce that was varied endlessly when trying to "solve the block". To have a valid block you need all these. Similar for a NMC block. Right? Thus, if you are looking for valid BTC blocks, you are looking for BTC blocks which couldn't possibly pass as valid NMC blocks. I don't see how that could affect NMC in any way either via reward or via helping to secure the network.