Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Suggestion: length limitation to trust ratings
by
cryptohunter
on 02/02/2019, 15:53:43 UTC
Quote from: qwk on February 02, 2019, 03:42:23 PM
Quote from: cryptohunter on February 02, 2019, 03:22:08 PM
Quote from: theymos on February 02, 2019, 02:56:03 PM
Quote from: cryptohunter on February 02, 2019, 02:54:17 PM
Well just the ones that do not conform to the new standards. I suspect he will re apply those in a more sensible/accurate manner soon.
No, that was a clear case of trust spam. 200+ very similar ratings with many against the same users over and over again. He's banned for 14 days.
Fair enough.. it was perhaps an extreme way of presenting his objection.
But surely  he will be allowed to replace some of the red trust within the new conditions you have set.
It was the manner/ format and extreme nature of presenting his message that got him banned ... am I correct?
Being banned for 14 days means just that.
After 14 days, he's welcome to come back and post new negative feedback on my profile. Cool

I wonder if there is some "content" that you could post in a trust rating that would obviously not be allowed.
Death threats come to mind, so that's probably something that will lead to ratings being deleted.
Anything else is probably more or less fine Wink

I was not aware this was on your own profile.

However, your latest red trusting of a vip member without proving it is hacked is going to I'm sure result in some tags. That does not look like a clear cut hacked account at all. Neutral should be enough to relay the message you believe it "could" be under new control.

Also the inclusions you have made on DT raises some eyebrows from several members.

Yes of course death threats and clear hate crimes are not allowed. Those things are actually illegal are they not?  the forums rules are the last thing you would worry about if you were posting those threats.

Anyway thanks for answer. The only way to abuse the trust system currently is spamming it or death threats.

I hope we can improve this in the future so that it is more about trust and something people can use as an indication before starting a trade.

I mean it is feasible that theymos wants everyone to have some red so that all traders are terrified of trading and take all possible precautions with every trade regardless of who it is. Smiley  That could be a smart move to stop scammers but still it will result in people who feel wronged (rightly so from a moralistic pov) going ballistic when they first spot their red .