Hello Saydia. As of the time of writing this, there are over 670,000 words of information on the project including weekly updates, milestones, team information and legal information. This is without including the almost daily updates via social media and the press and hours of AV presentations available on the websites and Tratok Ltd's different web properties. Compared with the industry this is a wealth of information. However, I understand that with so much information, one can simply decide to not make an effort to read as they find themselves overwhelmed. This is a problem our team encounters with certain community members that do not care about the actual value of disruptive capability of use cases but simply only care about "when moon?!". As a project that hopes to change the way people travel, we are interested in those who actually understand the technology rather than those who simply wish to speculate and expect unreasonable returns.

Regarding the ICO, had you taken 5 minutes to read this thread of the website, you would have seen there was no ICO as well as the reasoning behind this approach and the extensive and expensive feasibility studies conducted by a leading bank, two tourism boards and four sector economists that made us take this approach. However, instead of making this effort, you simply decided to comment that the project has "scant information". You are entitled to your opinion, as everyone is, but I do encourage you to actually read into the project and asses the impact it can have.