This is completely the opposite for what DT was designed for.
DT can not red trust people for telling the truth and encouraging others to view the evidence to support their claim. The very notion of using red trust this way is disgraceful and although I can tell you have a good mind for presenting a case for anything there is no way for this to be justified.
I would hear your thoughts on the entire matter. This is not at all the same circumstances and accomplishment as your example.
"Absolutely not", is not applicable in this specific case. Unless you agree with the actions of this person.
This is not a grey area like accounts being sold this is totally wrong and against the very principles that DT is supposed to represent.
I know you don't care but you're incorrect in your assumptions about what Trust is to be used for. Trust can be given out for any reason a user sees fit, though theymos discourages leaving ratings based on post quality:
On feedback pages, you can leave trade feedback. There are no rules for this, but here are some guidelines:
- List all of the trades that you do with people (or at least the major ones). This is not like #bitcoin-otc where you give people just one score.
- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.
- Older ratings count for more, so don't delete old ratings if you can avoid it.
- "Risked BTC" is how much money you could have lost if the person you're rating had turned out to be a scammer. Or, if they are a scammer, it's how much you lost. Use the BTC value at the time of reporting.
- It's OK to post a rating about the person in general, not tied to a specific trade.
- If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating.
Any arguments people make about what Trust is supposed to be used for should reference this list first as it is from the OP of when the Trust system was first introduced.
Please see try to comprehend the stupidity of what you are saying in relation to a score based trust system, and what a corrupt and devious disgusting snake you look like by suggesting it is okay to red trust someone for telling the truth and presenting fact regarding wrongdoing.
DT scores mean absolutely nothing at all if people are getting red trust for highlighting proven wrong doing. Imagine if everyone did this then red trust would be a positive thing in some cases. The entire scoring would be a total waste of time. LOL
WARNING TRADE WITH EXTREME CAUTION THIS PERSON TRIED TO INFORM ON A PROVEN LIAR/SCAMMERS.
haha the wonderful world of meta...
There is no point having a score if some people red for untrustworthy deeds and some red for trust worthy deeds.
Just have a link called feedback and people can decide for themselves is the person who is proven to have lied for financial gain is more trustworthy than someone who high lighted that FACT.
No get back to supporting liars and scammers with some other new variation of ass kissing.
You can not use the red trust to silence people telling the truth and about liars and scammers. Please don't suggest such ludicrous things in public it makes you look completely corrupt.
I would say if anything we should look at the distinct possibility your account is hacked. No chance any person supporting bruno previously would start supporting scammers and liars that ~ bruno. I think people should analyse your account for being hacked or sold snake boy.