I partially agree, you need to have someone that is in charge and has the right experience to be able to make the right decisions. This person could be elected by a system like a dao maybe. A bunch of people hardly have the knowledge to take some important decision, i would like to know a case where that worked out well

My 2 cent

This will be a very interesting experiment, are the masses intelligent enough to handle the freedom of the choice.
This is why there is not only the DAO, but also the strategic funds;
these two entity will be complementary and competitor as well. I believe in the power of the crowd, the collaborative genius, I know it slowing down process, but there is one thing you forgot: if there are 5'000 tokens holders accessing the DAO, you have 5'000 ambassador, who will organize a bounty, spread the word, and increase the adoption of Jarvis.
I am very curious how that "complementary and competitor" will look in detail.
Many projects, teams, groups in the real world fail in these decision-making processes, its not easy, but I also believe in an intelligence of the crowd.