Lauda is Lauda, that's how she/he rolls. What I support is the anti-spam/anti-shitposting/anti-forum pollution attitude and actions. Nothing else. I don't support scams or extortion or even abusive feedback, which is why I haven't given cryptohunter or any of these other guys a neg. Do I trust them? Not really. But as Theymos said, this is just forum politics and isn't worthy of negative trust. You can quote me on this and delete the post, I don't care, but that's what's in my mind.
Edit: I took that thread as a joke on Lauda's part, though I'm sure he/she does want people to make that trust list into their own. There's not an actual cult or gang, but there's obviously a divide between a lot of senior members here. I'm starting to gravitate toward the middle instead of digging in my heels.
If you arent supporting abusive feedbacks,are you will willing to exclude foxup,lauda and others or give them negative trust? im sure you arent because you are leech whom sucking other's blood just to keep yourself alive.
You see? you have tagged a lot of people from the past with alts accounts,shitposters etc. which doesnt violate any forum rules according to theymos.You are abusive with your position,either way your gang's time will come you can deny that you arent part of this hierarchy but the people here knows who's part of lauda's ring like what you have said to your negative trusts,acc farmers/alts,merit abusers whatever BS.