the reality was that 2x would never actually have got adopted as core designed and implemented code to REKT it as soon as segwit(x1) got its threshold
And don't forget the part where the /btc1 devs
pulled the plug in November 2017. It's kinda hard for forks to gain adoption if the devs abandon them completely.
need you forget the 2x was dropped in august.. even though the activation wasnt due until atleast november.
2x was a non event of fake choice.. many knew it was not a real viable option, and was just a ruse to simply try to get 1x opposers to accept 1x by saying 2x was an option.. right up to the date that 1x got adopted..
in a different topic u provided the link and you were very loudly proud of their attempts to kill off 2x
Pretty sure I just said I'm not denying that incompatible nodes were disconnected.
Here's the rationale for it.
....
I agreed with it then and I agree with it now.
mmhmm.. u agreed that nodes should be disconnected 3 months BEFORE an activation of those nodes bips
mmhmm.. u agreed that nodes should disconnect BTC1 (Segwit2x) nodes 3 months before segwit2x activates
anyway. im done trying to translate ur flip flops. might be worth u doing some research on what bitcoin is all about and how bitcoin was invented to stay away from needing a "core"
and then maybe finally you can decide if ur a flip or a flop. and atleast stick with one narrative