Hi CFB,
I think I've got it now. The final result;
And an extra image for the interested people.
Made it a little sketchy, because we are in development :p
I think I've got it now. The final result;
And an extra image for the interested people.
Made it a little sketchy, because we are in development :p
Very nice, looks very serious.
http://wallet.nxtarea.com:7874/nxt?requestType=getBalance&account=11613767591090258913
http://www.nxtvote.com/view.php?vote=10667094504543355029
Someone voted the following for EvilDave - "Yes, he is. Pure Evil thru and thru."
Seems the count is working. Double voting from the same account should be forbidden.
It also doesn't matter if you send 1 NXT or 5 NXT or 1000 NXT for the vote. It's always counting as 1 vote, as long as it comes from 1 account with the required attributes.
http://www.nxtvote.com/view.php?vote=10667094504543355029
Someone voted the following for EvilDave - "Yes, he is. Pure Evil thru and thru."
Seems the count is working. Double voting from the same account should be forbidden.
It also doesn't matter if you send 1 NXT or 5 NXT or 1000 NXT for the vote. It's always counting as 1 vote, as long as it comes from 1 account with the required attributes.
This system will be gamed, I guarantee it. What's to stop me from sending 100 accounts 1 NXT each now (to register public key), and in the future I will be able to have the voting power of 100 people? I simply transfer the minimum require funds to each account before the vote.
In addition, it seems that you are going for the more "fair" system, but by setting a minimum NXT holding limit, aren't you excluding all those who have less than this amount? So small stakeholders are being disenfranchised even more so than the 1 NXT = 1 vote system.