It wasn't until we saw consensus in action that it became more apparent just how strongly people feel about it.
and under HONEST consensus.. core only got 35%
Those people who are supporting this network without reimbursement by running a non-mining node have already paid a cost, so understandably they will enforce rules on the network which prevent increasing that cost against their will. More people now seem to respect this logic.
yet core implemented an activation that was done via controversial means.....
seems you really need to get out of your echo chamber of myths.
again the devs themselves will happily admit their actions.. so i wonder why are you still defending them as innocent when they plead guilty to their actions
so mr flip flop who in one post admits that disconnecting nodes PRE activation occured..
where is the "network that prevents x against their will" where is the "respect"
(pre-empt echo:
mandated controversial bilateral split
inflight upgrade
controversial forks
compatible sheep nodes of abstaining counted as approval)
you can flip and flop in and out for many more months..(i dont see why you prefer to continue that, as its no longer funny, but making me yawn at you now)
or just sit back do some research, update your echo chamber and then comeback with a single narative.. or you can skip your flip flop narative and just get to the point that you want bitcoin to remain low utility so that commercial networks become popular in the hopes that you can get paid for running a commercial hub on such commercial networks..
but. to help you out and pr-empt future echo's about your desires of geting paid as a full node.. you will run into the infographic windfury provided that will show who will actually get to be the commercial hubs making income from running full nodes.
meaning your not gonna get rich supporting cores roadmap. so atleast wake up to your motives and how they wont manifest into you getting rich by sticking with the myth echos of supporting core centralists