Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Merits 2 from 2 users
Re: Red trust on Bestmixer: is this justified?
by
TheNewAnon135246
on 08/02/2019, 08:53:03 UTC
⭐ Merited by tmfp (1) ,LoyceV (1)
I changed my negative feedback to a neutral feedback a few days ago because I revised my decision (edit: updated the feedback description/ref link). I am not going to delete my post (or parts of it). Feel free to report it to a moderator if you feel that it breaks forum rules.

While you are replying here, I checked out your website and I found some contradictions on it:

Quote
We want to be free on the Internet. All of our rights and obligations are based on the principles of crypto-democracy which we have to form together with you.

Quote
Owing to blockchain technology which ensures trust between us and the client without the need for any third party intervention or mediating government agency, we ultimately have no need of registering in the pursuit of keeping anonymity and freedom alive on the internet.

Quote
And, most importantly, since our service is completely anonymous and we are answerable to no one but the client whom we serve, we will do whatever is necessary to keep the confidentiality of every transaction regardless of where in the world they originate from or what the government policies in those countries may be.

Your terms of service says otherwise:







Could you explain why you are claiming to offer fully anonimity and freedom, answer to no one/government policies and serve customers from anywhere in the world while your terms of service basically forbids every reason why someone would want to use a mixer?