marlboroza where'd you go? This was your scam fight...
Sorry, I was busy, "trying to keep newbie accounts off the forum".However, unless Im vastly mistaken, I believe my thoughts and actions are in line with how the administration of this forum would like to see things being done. If Im wrong, please theymos or Cobra reach out to me via PM and help me see the error of my ways.
You don't need theymos and Cobra to PM you something that many people see. It was presented to you many times, it is just you have ignored everything people have told you.You don't appreciate anyone nor anyone's work here. It's only about you, you and you and how great and trustworthy you are. This is impression I got about you lately. Just read your replies.
And to be honest, you have completely lost it, sending merit to someone who is suggesting people in reputation to exclude all people who are actively tagging scammers and to add several scammers to their trust network? Just because you have this fight with Lauda?
You want to talk about:
EDIT: Where are all the scam busters when an ACTUAL THREAT appears?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 So where are you?You have time to reply in scam accusation against fortune jack several times for reason which is very well known to everyone here, but when someone has real problem with cashing out 33BTC from another gambling site, where are you?
I am asking you, where are you?
I dont spend my time looking for people to tag... who scam
FTFYThen don't insult people who do with your "questions", "assumptions" and "conclusions".
Great example. I've excluded the user who was promoting this operation from my trust network. I see you went the opposite way and included him in yours.
Because someone is tagging those they consider "scammers" does not mean they should be allowed to use the trust system for personal selfish reasons or to stifle free speech. I consider those sorts of persons very dangerous to this movement. If they must remain then they need to be tagging scammers only not tagging anyone they choose for any reason they choose. This is the main issue here.
You mean someone like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49514571#msg49514571 ?Quote
I see you have no problem now advertising the other gambling house mentioned in marlboroza's quote as facing a scam accusation. How convenient.
Strange to mention Fortunejack:
If you take a compensation (in this case a bug bounty), you are legally entitled to nothing.
This is my current opinion on bugs and compensations and we can leave it at that.You really need to stop being tied to scams. Literally everything you touch turns into a scam. ICOs you escrow, signatures you wear, somehow people always end up having their money stolen, and it always seems to not be your fault, then it happens again.
However, it seemed a good opportunity to display how useless the current tagging efforts are, that they literally dont even tag actual scam threats because theyre too busy trying to keep newbies off the forum.
Sounds like something for you, others are too busy with newbies.So you won't be changing anything about the paused campaign for a scam, as alleged by marlboroza? I assume marlboroza has no issue with this and will keep Hhampuz in his trust network, but has an issue I didn't spend the time to research this issue to tag whoever was behind it (because I wasn't aware of it)? Wow...
I see you have no problem now advertising the other gambling house mentioned in marlboroza's quote as facing a scam accusation. How convenient. Yes, ignore away. That'll fix the problem here...
marlboroza where'd you go? This was your scam fight...
You were not aware of it, yet you just said you excluded me from your trust network due to it? That seems... conflicting. No?I see you have no problem now advertising the other gambling house mentioned in marlboroza's quote as facing a scam accusation. How convenient. Yes, ignore away. That'll fix the problem here...
marlboroza where'd you go? This was your scam fight...
That's not the reason I've excluded you, but it does seem to reinforce my judgement as being correct.
You want to talk about:
You have time to reply in scam accusation against fortune jack several times for reason which is very well known to everyone here, but when someone has real problem with cashing out 33BTC from another gambling site, where are you?
I am asking you, where are you?
EDIT: Where are all the scam busters when an ACTUAL THREAT appears?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0 So where are you?You have time to reply in scam accusation against fortune jack several times for reason which is very well known to everyone here, but when someone has real problem with cashing out 33BTC from another gambling site, where are you?
I am asking you, where are you?
Great example. I've excluded the user who was promoting this operation from my trust network. I see you went the opposite way and included him in yours.
http://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-25_Fri_22.33h/18321.html
This confused me!
OG excluded Hhampuz for this reason but didn't excluded Hhampuz for this reason, and wasn't aware of this but excluded Hhampuz for it
Best part - scam accusations have been opened after January 25. 2019
You guys are just pointing out how much more trustworthy my actions have been than yours and how hypocritical your trust networks are...
