You do realise that in opposing me and my views you are simply fighting against the formation of a transparent , fair and equal system
yes cryptohunter anyone who disagrees with anything you have to say is a fighting against a fair system.
let me correct you on this, I totally agree with your intention of trying to enforce a fair trust system, i bet most members do, but i totally disagree with how you go about achieving it, let's just say we both are fighting the same fight with completely different weapons.
you are more focused on individual members, you are wasting a lot of time on them, for an instance, you have to bring this Lauda thing at every possible post, me on the other hand don't know who lauda is and i honestly don't give a fuck about him/her, and without having to read much, i know he/she must have used the trust system terribly in many cases, including yours, but I also know that he/she must have tagged a good amount of scammers and this is the main reason why other people trust him/her, this applies to many other DT members.
and i personally would rather see lauda or any DT member for that matter being forced by theymos to use the trust system in trust related matters only, instead of seeing them off the list.
my approach is to encourage proper use of trust system ,whereby anybody would look at anybody's negative score knowing those are either scammers or at least potential scammers , rather than having to read stupid feedback that are based on personal issues.
and i am certain that eventually we will get there.
also i would like to point you out to something >
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0do you really think that removing every single member who trusts lauda from DT list will make the forum a safer and better place ?
sorry ,i just can't seem to agree with how many of you are you going about making this a better place.