I like it, because the discussion would give everyone the opportunity to judge for themselves what's the truth, and what's bullshit.
I used to also believe that scaling Bitcoin would be as easy as a hard fork to big blocks. But the more I learned, I found out that it wasn't. Big blocks are inherently centralizing. We know that Gavin, Mike Hearn, and Faketoshi know it, but why were they pushing for it?
I used to also believe that scaling Bitcoin would be as easy as a hard fork to big blocks. But the more I learned, I found out that it wasn't. Big blocks are inherently centralizing. We know that Gavin, Mike Hearn, and Faketoshi know it, but why were they pushing for it?
They were against anything that Core developed and implemented, because they wanted the control. This is why they forked off
, for them to have full control over their own shitcoin. They could not take over Bitcoin with XT, so they tried a new angle with Bitcoin Cash and this gave them control over their own coin to implement what they wanted.
Classic 3 Letter agency strategies.
