Isn't an easy puzzle...
NatashaOtomoski > Satoshi Nakamoto...
21 > Total bitcoin supply in millions
.txt > Satoshi White paper?
Teeth >
I think the answer of this puzzle is in the bitcoin white paper... i will try to brute force that.
Quote
WhyTheCombOfNatashaOtomoskiHas21Teeth?.txt
NatashaOtomoski > Satoshi Nakamoto...
21 > Total bitcoin supply in millions
.txt > Satoshi White paper?
Teeth >
I think the answer of this puzzle is in the bitcoin white paper... i will try to brute force that.
brute forcing is not good way for solving this puzzle. assume the white paper has 100 distinct words, total number of combinations is: 100! / (100-8)! = 7.50306389818e+15 . assume you have a good computer and it can compute 1000 combinations per second, total time of computing will be: 7.50306389818e+12 seconds= 237920 years.
I had in mind another kind of brute force. What i did was:
Code:
a1=(words count in wp.txt)
a=(a1 - 8)
for b in (sequence 1 to $a)
do
take words from $b to $b+8, if the sum is 32 char then save it on a file
done
a=(a1 - 8)
for b in (sequence 1 to $a)
do
take words from $b to $b+8, if the sum is 32 char then save it on a file
done
And what i get was this:
Code:
OfWorkFormingARecordThatCannotBe
ButProofThatItCameFromTheLargest
CameFromTheLargestPoolOfCPUPower
TheLargestPoolOfCPUPowerAslongAs
PowerAslongAsAMajorityOfCPUPower
OfWorkChainAsProofOfWhatHappened
OnTheInternetHasComeToRelyAlmost
DefineAnElectronicCoinAsAChainOf
AndThePublicKeyOfTheNextOwnerand
OwnerandAddingTheseToTheEndOfThe
OfCourseIsThePayeeCantVerifyThat
ReturnedToTheMintToissueANewCoin
SolutionIsThatTheFateOfTheEntire
GoThroughThemJustLikeABankWeNeed
ForThePayeeToKnowThatThePrevious
ToDoubleSpendTheOnlyWayToConfirm
TheMintBasedModelTheMintWasAware
ASystemForParticipantsToAgreeOnA
ServerWorksByTakingAhashOfABlock
ObviouslyInOrderToGetIntoTheHash
ValueThatWhenHashedSuchAsWithSHA
HashedSuchAsWithSHAThehashBegins
InTheblockUntilAValueIsFoundThat
IsFoundThatGivesTheBlocksHashThe
BlocksAreChainedAfterItTheWorkTo
AreChainedAfterItTheWorkToChange
ChainedAfterItTheWorkToChangeThe
OfWorkIsEssentiallyOneCPUOneVote
ProofOfWorkEffortInvestedinItIfA
IntoABlockEachNodeWorksOnFinding
FindsAProofOfWorkItBroadcastsThe
AProofOfWorkItBroadcastsTheBlock
IfAllTransactionsInItAreValidAnd
OfTheBlockByWorkingOnCreatingThe
BlockInThechainUsingTheHashOfThe
UsingTheHashOfTheAcceptedBlockAs
TheLongestChainToBeTheCorrectOne
LongestChainToBeTheCorrectOneAnd
OfWorkIsFoundAndOneBranchBecomes
NodesTheyWillGetIntoABlockBefore
WillGetIntoABlockBeforeLongBlock
ReceiveABlockItWillRequestItWhen
ItWillRequestItWhenItReceivesThe
OfTheBlockThisAddsAnIncentiveFor
AdditionOfAConstantOfAmountOfNew
OurCaseItIsCPUTimeAndElectricity
HelpEncourageNodesToStayHonestIf
ThanAllTheHonestNodesHeWouldHave
UsingItToGenerateNewCoinsHeOught
ItMoreProfitableToPlayByTheRules
ByTheRulesSuchRulesThatFavourHim
InACoinIsBuriedUnderEnoughBlocks
TreeWithOnlyTheRootIncludedInThe
NeedToBeStoredABlockHeaderWithNo
StorageShouldNotBeAProblemEvenIf
RunningAFullNetworkNodeAUserOnly
NetworkNodeAUserOnlyNeedsToKeepa
HeHasTheLongestChainAndObtainThe
BlockItsTimestampedInHeCantCheck
ForhimselfButByLinkingItToAPlace
ByAnAttackerWhileNetworkNodesCan
AsLongAsTheAttackerCanContinueTo
OneReturningTheChangeIfAnyBackTo
ReturningTheChangeIfAnyBackToThe
ProblemHereThereIsNeverTheNeedTo
HereThereIsNeverTheNeedToExtract
InputsWereOwnedByTheSameOwnerThe
WereOwnedByTheSameOwnerTheRiskis
OwnedByTheSameOwnerTheRiskisThat
SameOwnerTheRiskisThatIfTheOwner
ThemAnAttackerCanOnlyTryToChange
ByOneBlockIncreasingItsleadByAnd
AndTheFailureEventIsTheAttackers
OfAnAttackerCatchingUpFromAGiven
UpFromAGivenDeficitIsAnalogousTo
TrialsToTryToReachBreakevenWeCan
HasToCatchUpWithIncreasesWithThe
TheRecipientBelieveHePaidHimForA
OfBlocksAheadOfTimeByWorkingOnit
IsLuckyEnoughToGetFarEnoughAhead
AndBlocksHaveBeenlinkedAfterItHe
BeenlinkedAfterItHeDoesntKnowThe
ToSolveThisWeproposedAPeerToPeer
NetworkUsingProofOfWorkToRecordA
TheyDoNotNeedToBeIdentifiedSince
TheyWereGoneTheyVoteWithTheirCPU
ButProofThatItCameFromTheLargest
CameFromTheLargestPoolOfCPUPower
TheLargestPoolOfCPUPowerAslongAs
PowerAslongAsAMajorityOfCPUPower
OfWorkChainAsProofOfWhatHappened
OnTheInternetHasComeToRelyAlmost
DefineAnElectronicCoinAsAChainOf
AndThePublicKeyOfTheNextOwnerand
OwnerandAddingTheseToTheEndOfThe
OfCourseIsThePayeeCantVerifyThat
ReturnedToTheMintToissueANewCoin
SolutionIsThatTheFateOfTheEntire
GoThroughThemJustLikeABankWeNeed
ForThePayeeToKnowThatThePrevious
ToDoubleSpendTheOnlyWayToConfirm
TheMintBasedModelTheMintWasAware
ASystemForParticipantsToAgreeOnA
ServerWorksByTakingAhashOfABlock
ObviouslyInOrderToGetIntoTheHash
ValueThatWhenHashedSuchAsWithSHA
HashedSuchAsWithSHAThehashBegins
InTheblockUntilAValueIsFoundThat
IsFoundThatGivesTheBlocksHashThe
BlocksAreChainedAfterItTheWorkTo
AreChainedAfterItTheWorkToChange
ChainedAfterItTheWorkToChangeThe
OfWorkIsEssentiallyOneCPUOneVote
ProofOfWorkEffortInvestedinItIfA
IntoABlockEachNodeWorksOnFinding
FindsAProofOfWorkItBroadcastsThe
AProofOfWorkItBroadcastsTheBlock
IfAllTransactionsInItAreValidAnd
OfTheBlockByWorkingOnCreatingThe
BlockInThechainUsingTheHashOfThe
UsingTheHashOfTheAcceptedBlockAs
TheLongestChainToBeTheCorrectOne
LongestChainToBeTheCorrectOneAnd
OfWorkIsFoundAndOneBranchBecomes
NodesTheyWillGetIntoABlockBefore
WillGetIntoABlockBeforeLongBlock
ReceiveABlockItWillRequestItWhen
ItWillRequestItWhenItReceivesThe
OfTheBlockThisAddsAnIncentiveFor
AdditionOfAConstantOfAmountOfNew
OurCaseItIsCPUTimeAndElectricity
HelpEncourageNodesToStayHonestIf
ThanAllTheHonestNodesHeWouldHave
UsingItToGenerateNewCoinsHeOught
ItMoreProfitableToPlayByTheRules
ByTheRulesSuchRulesThatFavourHim
InACoinIsBuriedUnderEnoughBlocks
TreeWithOnlyTheRootIncludedInThe
NeedToBeStoredABlockHeaderWithNo
StorageShouldNotBeAProblemEvenIf
RunningAFullNetworkNodeAUserOnly
NetworkNodeAUserOnlyNeedsToKeepa
HeHasTheLongestChainAndObtainThe
BlockItsTimestampedInHeCantCheck
ForhimselfButByLinkingItToAPlace
ByAnAttackerWhileNetworkNodesCan
AsLongAsTheAttackerCanContinueTo
OneReturningTheChangeIfAnyBackTo
ReturningTheChangeIfAnyBackToThe
ProblemHereThereIsNeverTheNeedTo
HereThereIsNeverTheNeedToExtract
InputsWereOwnedByTheSameOwnerThe
WereOwnedByTheSameOwnerTheRiskis
OwnedByTheSameOwnerTheRiskisThat
SameOwnerTheRiskisThatIfTheOwner
ThemAnAttackerCanOnlyTryToChange
ByOneBlockIncreasingItsleadByAnd
AndTheFailureEventIsTheAttackers
OfAnAttackerCatchingUpFromAGiven
UpFromAGivenDeficitIsAnalogousTo
TrialsToTryToReachBreakevenWeCan
HasToCatchUpWithIncreasesWithThe
TheRecipientBelieveHePaidHimForA
OfBlocksAheadOfTimeByWorkingOnit
IsLuckyEnoughToGetFarEnoughAhead
AndBlocksHaveBeenlinkedAfterItHe
BeenlinkedAfterItHeDoesntKnowThe
ToSolveThisWeproposedAPeerToPeer
NetworkUsingProofOfWorkToRecordA
TheyDoNotNeedToBeIdentifiedSince
TheyWereGoneTheyVoteWithTheirCPU
I test those phrases as brainwallets but itdoesn't work
