⭐ Merited by vapourminer (1)
searched for 'channel factories' and 'sighash_noinput' in your steemit piece
could not find
afaiu they - with schnorr - are the pieces of the puzzle that that lot of devs think might address all your concerns about blocksize and huge hubs/banks
could not find
afaiu they - with schnorr - are the pieces of the puzzle that that lot of devs think might address all your concerns about blocksize and huge hubs/banks
Please search my blog post for Edit: wherein I have noted your peer review. Note that before these edits, my linked blog had already mentioned the channel factories but not by that name and had already linked to the relevant paper by C.Decker et al. AFAICT, that Layer 3 technology doesnt solve the fundamental flaw I have alleged and explained in my blog.
AFAICT, sighash_noinput doesnt address the fundamental flaw I raised and if it were extended to the point of making on-chain transaction capacity unbounded (which is not its intended purpose) then it would destroy miner revenue. I have pointed this out in my edits.
P.S. This continuing discussion may be heading off-topic from the issues I was addressing about my perma-ban and its evolving into technological discussion (which would not fall under the umbrella of linking the blog to refute @Gmaxwells post about my perma-ban). So to avoid others accusing me of circumventing the perma-ban and discussing technology in Meta, I respectfully request that any future technological discussion be in a private message or another forum. I am available on protonmail as well. I also have a GPG key.
Aren't you making a substantive post by providing links to your various topics (likely crap, but whatever).
Who gives a ratt's ass that you making this particular post in meta, since you are not keeping the topic of your post related to the subject of attempting to get your account(s) back or attempting to resolve your perma-ban issues (to the extent there are any outstanding possible issues?), so I don't really understand how that kind of posting conduct, including this particular post, could be "respecting the perma-ban."
Maybe someone can educate me? I don't proclaim to be an expert in "respecting the perma-ban", so maybe I am missing something?
Who gives a ratt's ass that you making this particular post in meta, since you are not keeping the topic of your post related to the subject of attempting to get your account(s) back or attempting to resolve your perma-ban issues (to the extent there are any outstanding possible issues?), so I don't really understand how that kind of posting conduct, including this particular post, could be "respecting the perma-ban."
Maybe someone can educate me? I don't proclaim to be an expert in "respecting the perma-ban", so maybe I am missing something?
[ ]
My post was both pointing out that I havent been evading the ban for some 9 months. For example, as a point about good behavior in case for example @Theymos decided that I dont have to kiss his feet and he can respect my independence and dignity while still doing the correct action and removing the perma-ban in the middle of a crypto winter so he won't have egg all over his face when the altcoin I am working on likely ends up being in the Top 10 on the next bull market circa 2021. The subtle allusions to the fact that I am making a lot of progress on my work, was intended to be a subtle hint to that effect for the astute.
My post was also providing a holistic compilation of the posts which were deleted by @mprep. I do believe @mprep allowed such links to archives to be posted here, because many other users complained about losing the context of discussions they had been involved in [ ]
On further reflection and until further notice, I kindly withdraw any perceived request to be unbanned, because it would actually reduce my productivity because I would end up consuming much of my time on never ending technical and political-economic debates (and especially the sort of ad hominem vacuous content attacks that unfortunately seem so prevalent on bitcointalk.org), such as this recent itch I had to scratch to correct some very important errors in @dinofelis overconfident technical arguments. And when I am overworked and exhausted (being age 54 and still suffering from some gut dysbiosis causing delirium weary fatigue), I tend to get sloppy with my writing and thought process. Much better for me to post my rebuttals elsewhere where the counter parties arent likely to bother to signup to go debate me there, so that I dont end up wasting precious time that needs to be focused on coding and development work.
I do hope that Theymos and the mods will not ban those (who are not my sockpuppets!) who decide to post links to my comments in the relevant threads of BCT?
Also I received a respectful and courteous reply from @Theymos in a PM about my critique of Grin, so that is a positive step for building some mutual respect. Id like to leave it rest with that for the time being.