Ziskinberg, that was harsh, double check the reason for the negative trust, plz.
Also we have steady online between 300 - 500 players, and they trust us perfectly well with their money (and their expectations always met).
We've launched DuckDice in 2016 - and since then all the mess is around one participant of our deposit bonus campaign which happened 1.5 year ago, isn't it a bit far fetched to call licensed casino "shady" because of a one (not really straight forward) case which occur long time ago?
Good for you that you still have a big number of players playing in your site, what I'm saying is that :
I guess your trust rating is already enough for people to judge and make a decision whether to still gamble or not
I'm not concluding things, gamblers still has the choice whether they will play or not, your rating affects your reputation only within the forum and I'm sure you have a lot of gamblers who are not members in this forum.
I don't care for trust ratings on this forum at all, and nobody should. When Edward from primedice buys trust he gets a lot of bad feedback, but then Stunna asks nicely and everyone removes it anyways. bitcointalk has become a necessary evil for most bitcoin site owners.
Duckdice is the best and fairest dice out there, they made a slip-up and the community hasn't been and isn't fair.