Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest
by
chrysophylax
on 15/02/2019, 07:27:39 UTC

For those that actually know me - and those that don't ...

I do NOT PR anything, unless it is a CWI service or product, and even then I suck at marketing anyway. This was NOT a PR of any sort, nor was it an attack of any sort either.

It is and stays as fact. Nothing more. SIN in biblical, economic and social terms is ALWAYS considered in the negative. ALWAYS. No matter what you say or do here, no matter whether you agree or disagree, the facts remain. Look every where you go, the term SIN is nothing more than a negative in the 'religious' sector, and a negative in the 'moral' sector, and almost any other sector you car to look, except for satanic believers. I do not, nor ever will, PR or oppose this unless I believe I need to do so. This was NOT a negative post, but a post about what in fact, SIN actually means and society concurs with everything I have mentioned.

What you (the SUQA team) are producing is quite substantial in terms of what it will do withing the CryptoIndustry. What you are creating is a positive juncture and a development worth marketing and getting a lot of PR for, but I certainly believe it should be POSITIVE PR and marketing, not something from the onset is of a negative connotation from the get go.

If you cannot see that (no matter what you are naming the nodes), then you need to heed my words of wisdom, as I am much more than a newbie with religious delights or doom. I speak the truth, the facts and nothing more. The few that believe SIN is a great symbolism of what you are about and what you are going to bring into the market, are disillusioned if you think the 'masses' will adopt anything based on what originally is a negative and religious based word. Don't believe me, then go right ahead and mark my words. We will see how far you get in society as a whole, with what little adoption you get 'to the masses' with a word like SIN. It just doesn't work. It never has.

FACTS! That is all I am presenting here. Agree or disagree, like it or hate it, they are facts and will remain so no matter what you think or believe.

So in the event you fail miserably with this naming convention, will you then come to me and preach how right I was? Hell no! Of course you won't. But that is all part and parcel of what this industry has become. So you will do what you want no matter what any one says, but be warned, as I am not just your average guy that just started here yesterday. I have seen as much, if not more than most here, and can assure you that your direction with your naming convention will cause you grief in the majority, even if the minority approve.

For those of you that know me ... this is not a PR - good or bad. This is not marketing - good or bad. Just facts.

The tech the SUQA team is creating however, is really going to set a standard. It is just a pity you choose a word that does not denote the uplifting tech behind it.

Just for your reading pleasure,you know, because I have no idea what I am talking about and it's ALL positive connotations and all that Wink - https://www.google.com/search?q=meaning of sin

#crysx

You are right but just partially. And you tell about word "sin" not abbreviation SIN
It could have negative effect only for english-speakers
Of course english is one of the most popular language but it's not the only language
So association word "sin" and abbreviation SIN is actual only for them

Of course mate ...

But it IS the universal language spoken in almost EVERY country in the world, and taught in almost every country also.

Is all good though. I was making a point and I made my point. Abbreviation or not, this is something that will be a negative in this society, and it will continue to be so. It just saddens me that the work that the SUQA team are putting in, will make for little help when it comes to those that do not accept the abbreviation OR the word. How many religious people in the world today? Hundreds? Thousands? Millions? or Billions? Even if not religious, the word/abbreviation is always taken in the negative, and if SUQA WANTS to maintain the abbreviation, then so be it. It is no one elses decision but theirs. Though these posts will remain (unless deleted of course) as a stand I take (or took at that time) when it all comes to head with the naming convention used.

That is all the point I wish to make now. Other than that, the tech is VERY good if it all comes out.

#crysx