Line 1 to 15 is complete waste of time. if anyone wants to investigate the case, i advice you to start reading from line no 16.
ok, so correct me if i am wrong.
your telegram account was hacked, the member sent 100$ worth of BTC to the scammer that uses the telegram account that was in your initial post, and then you simply "claim" that it was not you who got the money, you offered the guy a refund because somehow you are responsible for that, the next day you changed your mind and say you don't owe him anything.
and when you have been asked, why haven't you not warn about it, you said
I did not notified because I thought it won't be necessary, I deleted it from the topics.
so it didn't cross your mind that somebody might be already talking to the scammer on your telegram and sending them money?
if i was to believe that your telegram was actually hacked, i would still think you are responsible for being reckless.
the first thing you should have done was to notify others about this.
also as a responsible manager or whatever your position was, you should have used a single BTC address , signed and verified by you and stated that people should only send to this address, which is not there in your
self-moderated topic >
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5106534.msg49692509#msg49692509TL;DR , you deserve the tag for at least being careless about people's money.
and unless you pay back the money to that user, i don't think it's right for you to nag about the feedback, once you settle the scam accusation opened against you, you may get a better luck removing that tag or getting a counter, which i highly doubt anyway.