They had not uploaded participant list/spreadsheet yet, so we can't check their posting quality.
Most likely SteveStake forgot about merit system where most of managers are requiring even 5 earned merit (especially for btc signature).
Do you think he is doing right? What is your opinion ? Do you think they should reconsider their requirement?
Actually the first campaign have
spreadsheet so we can see how some users behave when they have the opportunity to post up to 200 posts per week. Most is still below the limit of 50 post per week, but few users post more then 100 post, and one is commend by campaign manager for reaching post cap of 200 posts.
I think they are not doing right this campaign, some basic rules are ignored and many participants have no minimum predisposition to participate in any signature campaign.