Also the accusation by nixon98 was made in the same thread as the last post nixon99 had posted before the hack accusation.
Prior to the hack accusation nixon99 posted in that thread frequently. After the accusation they didn't.
The account is used to announce the
[ANN][ICO] 🚀 AZBIT - Blockchain Investment Banking thread.
Other accounts associated with the project have symilar accusations against it.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=397698 cryptotech - hacked or sold accusation
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2527625 crimson876 - attempting to solicit paid comments from senior accounts
I see the posted quote of the PM, but those can easily be forged. I don't know that there's enough evidence that would convince me to paint nixon99 red.
Your suspicion is not wrong, PM message could be edit. But I don't think xtraelv edited it. Since nixon98 self admitted that is bought account so red tag is appropriate in my opinions. Since your question is about legitimate of accusation it could be verify by moderators. If nixon98 had not sent PM to xtraelv then he can come on this thread with his statement. So he can report PM to any specific moderators to verify legitimate. Red tag could be removed if he able to provide valid evidence.
nixon98 is the accuser
nixon99 is the hacked account
nixon99 admitted having bought the account after nixon98 wrote to his hacked account.
nixon98 forwarded the conversation to me when I requested to see a copy of the PM after I saw their accusation from October 2017


It appears the hacked and stolen account is used by the community manager of AZBIT on bitcointalk - nixon99



