A+ selective editing. Now try logic.
Your first paragraph claims I said something I didn't, when in fact I said the exact opposite, as I demonstrated in my last post.
Your second paragraph simply fails to provide evidence I asked for, and then again states I made an assumption I previously pointed out I didn't - there is nothing to respond to here.
Your third paragraph I demonstrated either doesn't work or doesn't change the system.
Your fourth paragraph doesn't require a response - I am not offering a solution because I'm not the one trying to change the system, and the assumptions you keep claiming I have made I have shown to be false.
A+ responding. Now trying addressing the points. Or don't. I'm kinda bored of going in circles as you attack me/fake assumptions/things I never said, instead of actually clarifying how you want your system to work.