What do you think about splitting the scam rating, with a "warning" rating for scammed previously OR you strongly believe that they will scam in the future, and a "scammer" rating for scammed previously AND you strongly believe that they will scam in the future?
I'm trying to decide which rating I would have used for my past ratings, and I think this leaves a large gray area.
A new user who posts
this for example hasn't scammed anyone, although I'm certain it's just the next alt-account made by a scammer, and it's obviously a scam waiting to happen. But technically he hasn't "scammed previously" until a victim shows up.
A few DTs tag account sellers/buyers, I'm curious if they'd use the lesser warning for this if it's possible.
I wouldn't mind getting more feedback (pun intended) on the feedback I've left. I
think I'm doing the right thing, but some feedback from upper management wouldn't hurt.