Hey guys I have different criterias:
1) ICO rating site
2) Design of the site (if it is too primitive and not unique dont even pay attention)
3) Social Networks and activity there.
4) Number of subscribers in telegram
5) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench
6) Huge partners. For example exchanges
7) Hype
What do you think is this enough, or you recommend to add something?
From this list, I would first of all pay attention to:
1) The presence of confirmed business partners - the more well-known this brand is, the better, respectively, but it is important that they have to be confirmed, not just announced, because announcements often turn out to be only marketing reception
2) Hype around the project - shows the public interest in the idea / technology
3) Team must pass KYC test on ICO Bench - without this, it is very likely that they are ordinary scammers
4) ICO rating of the project - it's not such an assessment really needs to be trusted, but in any case it is better when it is high .
5) Evaluation of the site design is very subjective, but of course, if you see that the site looks very bad and cheap, and the project declares multi-million partner agreements, then this should warn you.
At the same time, I would not pay attention to the number of people in the telegram channel, because most of them are just a bounty hunters. And it often happens that many of them are fake (bot accounts) owned by several people. The same, but to a lesser extent, I would say about the number of subscribers in social networks.