Please explain how its a lie when it was in fact a legitimate bug??
Said bug was caused by reducing the hop count of transaction requests to alleviate network load, which meant that hatchers were not getting a fair opportunity to take part.
Am I need to be accused of being a liar every time there is a bug, in beta software, that isn't launched?
Please....this is getting old and I'm getting tired of being professional about it!
He said the second hatcher does not belong to him but there seems be evidences saying otherwise.