What do projects that do not have the finances for listing on top exchanges? And another problem is that if there is no trading volume on the top exchange, then the coin can be delisting.And the project money was gone ....
The recent situation with Binance and delisting of many coins is a clear confirmation of your words. And by the way, many of the coins that Binance removed from his exchange paid them several million dollars for listing.
And the exchanges that provide free listing are little known. They have no trading volume. The project is only for quantity,but the project needs quality. Therefore, it is better to go to a smaller number of exchanges, but of high quality.
You are absolutely right. It is better to raise money and pay a listing on one exchange that belongs to the top level, than to have trading pairs on ten exchanges for which there are no users.
i would suggest even a couple of medium-type exchange with active traders and adequate volume would suffice. if you go outright to binance, you are just wasting huge amount of money that the team can use to their developments instead. and if they can't sustain the volume required on that exchange, they will be just delisted for nothing. a starting project does not need numerous exchanges to be listed at but continuous development from the team to further increase its worth in the exchange.
You are absolutely right. This Ichiba project is very interesting and promising, but let's be honest with ourselves - Ichiba is not yet ready to go on a top-level exchange. This needs to be done later ... maybe a year or two. Then there will be a positive effect.