With 1mb u need to get only monster fees to run btc sustainable but no masses that can afford these onchain secure txs. Not Bitcoin. U ll give up that business to a few 2nd layer middle men - not Bitcoin.
Speaking of fees, how many users would BSV need to have at BSV's current average fee to match the current fees miners get from BTC?
And what makes you think that BSV would be the first choice for people who don't want to pay the fees on the BTC chain? There are thousands of other coins. The only remarkable thing about BSV is the fraudulent clown at the helm trying to convince everyone they're supposedly satoshi. Not exactly a selling point. Beyond that, it's another coin that's slightly above Dogecoin in terms of nodecount. Why should anyone care?
And if by some miracle BSV does become popular and start filling blocks, it's going to be a few big companies running what few nodes remain. You will destroy any shred of decentralisation.
If u d know how industry is selective at adoption process u will see that legal and compliance is top filter.
What is the real clean thing of Bitcoin that is specked up, defined by a 'legal' relvant term sheet for tech and financial documentation?
It is scalable in industrial way - even mentioned by Satoshi already.
We are stuck here with bottom up 'adoption' and scams that had lead to coins all full of scammers.
Go and distill what is the real essence of Bitcoin and let that go viral, uncrippled.
It is only about sending p2p cash, for fraction of a cent - stored on a public blockchain - the world needs that new thing and the world is maximum decentralized, no need to be scared of 'central' control as we see from core and their way of dictatorship planning like in communism or kingdom.
Markets are free and lead to proper decentralization due to its sheer openess and fragility to any op risk that will break up any dominant corporation after some time ( see Bitmain actually).
Everything is well allined, relax at let the original Bitcoin do its work.