You are comparing violence that is against the rules of society with violence by society.  Ultimately we control society and the way to change it is to change people's minds.  In our societies, the rules we choose are based on commonly accepted ideas of what is good.  For example, you can talk about homesteading forever, but if you are being cruel to the animals that you own, society will take them off you, fine you a lot of money and forbid you from owning more animals.  Is that a breach of some right you thought you had?  Of course not.

All rights are social constructs and as such will be messy.  We want films so we allow movie makers copyright.  We want consumer goods so we allow brand owners have trademarks.  We want people to make the most of resources so we allow security of tenure.  We don't want cruelty so we confiscate dogs that are being tortured.  But we don't care as much if its a dog in a laboratory and we don't care at all if its a rat.  Is this logically consistent? Yes - rights are what society uses to achieve its goals and to see them as ends in themselves is to confuse the tool with the task.

Thats why I object to people saying intellectual property infringes some other right.  It misses the point of what a right is and why you are given it.