cryptodevil, I was due to health reasons not able to reply ... but I will have a look at your questions, and at your speculative interpretations ...

As these documents are public and partially could be relevant for the LEOcoin community, I let your post stand. Even when I find your conclusion premature and insinuating. However, I cannot speak for third parties, like mr. Kamran or Learning Enterprises Organisation Ltd. or the like. So, the court will have to decide on matters. I will have to read the documents a few more times, and if I see it necessary, I will add further thoughts.

The documents are obviously from the employment tribunal, but anyway; when you state "court findings against Andersson" I have to point you at the fact, that the allegations made against Mr. Andersson were not subject of this case, nor have they been discussed. They are mentioned as the opinion of Mr- Kamran, not as proven facts. This case was about the abrupt end of the employment relationship and whether or not this was according to employment law. I am not taking any stance on this, as said, and allegations could be true or false. For that reasons I labeled your conclusions as preliminary. Rest assured that we all are following the developments that relate to LEOcoin with great attention.