While observing the great responsability taken by some Mods who control more than one board (including all the childboards within), many others are almost doing nothing, due to low board activity like those in some local boards.
Eh. Why would someone moderate a board that has low-activity and no forum rules were being broken?
It will be so sad hearing that all the Mods receive the same paiement amount.
Not true. IIRC, mods are being paid depending on the amount of work they've done (feel free to correct me.)
Secondly, i start this thread to open a discussing about the exact role of a moderator and its limits.
Depending on their rank. There is a patroller (haven't seen one for a long time, and I think it is now removed by theymos effectively), moderator (your common moderator for a board) and global moderator (by the name itself, can do a moderator's job on any board/sub-board). There is a reply from theymos regarding the duties of different moderators, and I think I have to do some digging for that.
Who can judge the work of a mod? and how to complaint about him? but how to judge him his work when there is no official set of rules for them?
Only theymos can do that, officially. Mods can be reported by users directly to theymos or creating a thread about their misdoings and other things that lead to the abuse of their power.
and what kind of coordination can be set between Mods and DTs?
Should there be any special relationship between DTs and mods if all users, regardless of trust rating, can report a post directly to the mods if it violates a certain rule?