Secondly, i start this thread to open a discussing about the exact role of a moderator and its limits. Who can judge the work of a mod?
theymos
and how to complaint about him?
Start a thread in Meta. If said mod has jurisdiction over Meta and you think he's deleting any critical threads, at that point the situation is serious enough to directly contact theymos via PM.
but how to judge him his work when there is no official set of rules for them?
However you want I guess. Just make sure your ethics and vision of the forum aligns with theymos' (or the majority of the Bitcointalk community's) otherwise your attempts to criticize might be in vain.
and what kind of coordination can be set between Mods and DTs?
Hopefully distant and professional. There's a reason we don't moderate the Trust system (aside from perhaps clear cut flood or advertising spam cases; even then it's up to admins (maybe just theymos) to decide on when it's appropriate).
I didn't find any thread discussing the Mods following elements:
- Description
- Criteria
- Powers
- Limits
From
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0:
Q:What can do?A: Different ranks have different access to moderation tools. A quote from Salty Spitoon explains it pretty well:
<...>
Admins: can do everything imaginable on the site. They however can't delete their accounts.
Global Moderators: can perma ban, nuke newbies, see and handle reports from all sections, and see reported PMs.
Moderators: can see and handle reports from their sections and nuke newbies
Patrollers: Are essentially Moderators but can only do moderator tasks for newbie members.
<...>
As for criteria, I guess ask theymos since he's the one making the decisions on who gets made a mod.