Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [scenarios] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
by
LFC_Bitcoin
on 03/03/2019, 13:46:34 UTC
I don’t know why he has such an influence that we’re discussing him every single day.
Because people just can't keep him on ignore. I understand the appeal of trying to refute his points, as I occasionally get sucked in to the same thing with flat Earthers, creationists, etc, but just like these latter groups, there is literally nothing you can say that will change his mind. He's right, everyone else is wrong, and no amount of evidence will convince him otherwise.

I've not been following his most recent nonsense (as he remains firmly on ignore), but it seems that Loyce has put his suggested criteria* firmly to bed, as it makes fairly little difference to the list of DT1s (and probably no difference whatsoever to the list of DT2s). Inb4 he decides you should need 2000 activity and 100 merit to be allowed to be on DT1.



*1500/2000 activity and 100 merit, if I read things correctly? What a coincidence that these criteria perfectly fit cryptohunter himself. Roll Eyes

I just think he’d be a lot happier if he relaxed a bit.

Having him on DT1 would be a disaster in my opinion. I don’t think he’s a scammer at all but he’d be handing out red trust for arguments & disagreements all the time.