if Theymos started blacklisting people
So now that your cockamamie theories have been debunked you want to go back to a top-down DT structure.
I have a suspicion that if theymos started actively blacklisting several members, CH would not like those results either...CH will probably blame it on you if someone gets blacklisted that CH feels should not be blacklisted.
So the false speculations and assumptions just keep pouring in.
Do you ever stop to think before posting pure drivel?
You can only be blacklisted for abusing trust.
Your job as a DT is (as far as red trust is concerned)
1. red trust scammers
2. red trust persons STRONGLY likely to scam
you red trust others you are blacklisted.
Trust abusers are banned it is quite simple.
Stop asskissing suchmoon, huge black woman etc... it's sickening.
You make it seem like that is a total black and white decision. It isn't. Especially when you add some vague qualifier such as "strongly." Do you mean more likely than not or do you mean beyond all doubt?
well these are Theymos own words are they not? I thought he said that recently in his guidelines.
I mean if you build a STRONG case someone is a scammer or going to scam then that obviously means it needs to be strong. If you are red trusting without believing you can present a STRONG case in Theymos's mind then you are risking getting blacklisted.
This will cut out the blatant abuse and petty arguments and he called me this I called him that crap that people think they can paint you with a scam tag for. Or perhaps because you said you enjoyed LEMON tea. BOOM you're blacklisted. People can express their like or dislike of a fucking lemon without fearing their account getting a scam tag. suchmoon can make false assumptions of me admitting I have a sock puppet and I can't red trust them for that. People can not use "scare quotes" and red list you because you thought these were "normal" quotes when they were apparently quoting what you just said 3 times in that sentence.. People can say what they like so long as they are not scamming people out of money or setting up a scam.
I mean really if someone offers escrow in a thread with little history anyone can post in that thread beware this person has little history and should be wary. Same for possible scam icos or anything "possible" just hit the thread saying this looks dodgy for X reasons and present the reasons. I never fought scams before by hiding away and snitching on them. Just hit them there hard and in the alt discussion board saying it looks like a scam and present the reasons why.
You could tell them if they are on self moderated threads let you express your concerns on the thread and have them answered in public or then you feel that unwillingness to do this means they just crossed the threshold of "strongly" and will get some red pain until they change their minds.
There is no real reason to pain people red unless they scam or really appear to be setting up a scam. Call them out in public, if then they will not play ball... BOOM some red for them. It will then be their own fault.
No more using red trust to crush free and open discussion. This is not what red trust is for and certainly not for stopping persons telling the truth about other DT's prior wrong doing. That is the opposite of what red trust is for.
@suchmoon
Just contain yourself and make sensible posts that you can present some grounding for.
We know you are prone to making ludicrous statements that you are unable to present any kind of case for.
Take a moment to have a lay down. I think soon you will spiral into making "another" one of those types of claims.
I mean i see nothing on this entire thread except nonsense claims with no case behind them.