Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [scenarios] Changing Merit and Activity requirements for DT1-voting
by
suchmoon
on 04/03/2019, 01:41:10 UTC
Stingers was HONEST he said I will give merit to excellent posts that agree with my politics here.

False. Observe:

Sorry, for late support but I am also a victim of the trust abuse in the past. You can check my case on my trust feedback. It was a total harassment by DT and especially Lauda on me to put me down and out of this business.

A contribution from my side would be a bunch of merits, as per the discussion in this thread merit is one of the most important part to vote for the DT and change it. I have some smerits to award for all the trust abuse supportive here.

You need 10 earned merits to vote right?

I can provide you with that to be eligible for voting. Not many but some of the supportive and abused, Jr.member and newbies can vote because of my help which is an honour for me.

He simply stated he'll make users eligible for voting. No mention of "excellent posts".

You have nothing to throw back but a lot of screaming about "my sockpuppets" which is a false accusation. You have ZERO evidence and ZERO compelling examples of observable events to back it up.

If I had evidence you'd be banned. But you can observe this event (emphasis mine):

7. Loyce now says he wants to ban me from meta to silence me (well this account anyway)

It is far more likely you use puppets than I do "Scum Buster".

I know you don't like ScumBuster for obvious reasons but I don't need an alt to report posts... I do that from my account many times a day.