<...> Now prove it, bring some evidence or even some observable events that you can present or stop making false claims that I have lots of puppet accounts here. Do I seem like some coward or snitcher that needs a puppet account. <...>
Let me do this, if you don't mind.
~
Account:
cryptohunterPossible connected profile:
Chosen UsernameDecember 20, 2018, 09:04:29 PM - The report on
cryptohunter's plagiarism was published.
December 21, 2018, 08:21:36 PM -
Chosen Username has registered and claimed that s/he has a Legendary account.
their should be a statute of limitations agreed upon for plagiarism
2 or 3 years especially if it is not related to signature spam or shitposting
if you are motivated enough to go through the many years and thousands of posts on my legendary account you can probably find some example of text copied from someplace on the net without a link or something as an excuse to ban me
it was not a major concern back then but now it is a ticking time bomb and major anxiety
all it will take is to cross the wrong person enough for them to put in the time to search it all - they will probably find something - and all of years of effort i put into this forum will be gone and i would not even be able to start again with a new account because it would be ban evasion
this is true for many good users old accounts full of years of banter
a permanent account ban is harsh enough but a complete ban from even being able to start over is ludicrous
what should i do ? spend weeks searching all my old posts in google and delete anything that matches ? what if the post has been quoted ? what about archives or waybacks ?
December 26, 2018, 08:08:53 PM -
Chosen Username has received 2 merit from
cryptohunter for this post:
marlboroza using ""plagiarism"" as weapon to silence criticsall start with cryptohunter not agree when one of central gang say "pre merit legends are spammers"
CH point out the fact & data of the still broken aspect & centralize merit system correctly
marlboroza have most centralized merit history & get angry when data show
marlboroza then try stop CH with fake
RED TRUST but had to remove 4 fake
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086816.0gang cant handle criticism centralize merit
one of gang make sock first to ban CH on plagarisms
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48790244#msg48790244& fail - source was there but still "" Merited by Lauda (2), Foxpup (1), LoyceV (1)
next marlboroza main account start digging for plagarisms again to shut down CH with 4yoa post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg48828854#msg48828854& fail again
keep digging
marlboroza dig posts still today try to ban CH
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5086297.msg48837494#msg48837494still fail
this dirty tactic of marlboroza shut down opinion by search ancient post 4 plagarisms
we not worry about ""plagarisms"" in 2013-2014 like now
TP & SM hide from subject in threads
I say
dirty tactic used
you think good to use tactic ?
how u feel if marlboroza search all your old post 2 ban u on technical if u disagree with marlboroza ?marlboroza try find me 2 to dig 4 plagarisms but wont expose
apology - have to hide writing type or be attack by dirty tactic